|
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT CASE STUDIES
|
Six Steps to Building a Better Facilities Capital Budget
By Ray Dufresne, Vice President, Consulting Services Group, VFA, Inc.
VFA, Inc
www.vfa.com
Learn objective, data-driven techniques to prioritize capital projects and create capital budgets that deliver the greatest business value.
How will your organization determine
which capital projects to fund next year?
How will you determine the priority
of needs? And when the inevitable
unanticipated requirement arises – be it an
emergency equipment replacement or a
new management mandate – how will you
determine the impact on the budget?
Most organizations struggle with
questions such as these as they undertake
the process of developing capital plans and
budgets. Despite their best efforts to make
this process objective and transparent, in
reality, it can often be highly subjective
and political. In some cases, high-profile
projects may garner the lion's share of
funding. In others, the "squeaky wheel"
gets the grease, possibly at the expense of
greater overall organizational priorities.
Understanding how organizational
priorities translate to capital projects and
to budget line items requires an objective,
data-driven process that aligns project
criteria with strategic business goals
and objectives. It also requires a process
flexible enough to adapt to the inevitable
mid-course corrections and unplanned
spending needs that arise over the course
of the year.
Making Your Capital Budget Bullet-Proof
The six-step process below, which
VFA employs with its clients, helps
organizations create consensus about
overall business values and priorities, use
these to rate the value of capital projects,
and ultimately creation of capital budgets
that deliver the greatest business value.
A prerequisite to this process is
accurate and complete data about the
current condition and the renewal and
maintenance requirements of your
organization's capital assets. Your budget
depends on the quality and integrity
of this data. This information may be
collected by your own facility personnel,
outside assessors or a combination of
both. But everyone should employ
consistent methodology for gathering this
data. All stakeholders should also have
some level of access to this data through a
centralized database, along with the tools
to analyze requirements and estimate
funding needs, promoting accurate
"bottom up" budget projections.
Step 1: Establish a Team
Define a core group responsible for
establishing key goals, objectives and
responsibilities. The team will typically
include representatives from Finance,
Facilities, Operations and Executive
Management. Depending on your
organization, it may also include
representatives from each line of business
or each region.
Step 2: Create a Common Understanding
The members of your budget team will
have different backgrounds, skills sets
and perspectives on the capital planning
process. Provide them with "basic
training" in the language of capital
assets, including assessment terminology,
asset and requirement categorization
methods, cost estimation techniques, key performance metrics and how they are
calculated, and requirements for various
funding sources.
Step 3: Identify Evaluation Criteria
Understanding how
organizational priorities
translate to capital
projects and to budget
line items requires an
objective, quantitative
data-driven that aligns
project criteria with
strategic business goals
and objectives.
With organizational goals and priorities
clearly in mind, the group should
determine the specific criteria that will
be used to evaluate requirements and to
assigned priorities. These may include
such factors as building use, building
system, requirement category, current
facility condition, and the impact of
remediation on the facility condition
index. For example, one municipal
government identified life and safety
issues as the top priority in evaluating
capital requirements.
Step 4: Prioritize Projects
With prioritization criteria established,
the team can begin ranking facility
requirements based on business
importance factors. VFA often uses the
pair-wise comparison method to simplify
the choices clients face in prioritizing
projects. Pair-wise comparison rates
factors such as Urgency, FCI Score,
Category, System Type, and Building
Use, and then ranks and weights those
items as a basis for prioritizing capital
projects. This method may also be used
to prioritize items within a category,
for example, comparing and ranking
different types of building uses, from
administration to classroom to research.
The capital budget is then based on the
rankings and weighted scores from the
pair-wise comparisons.
Step 5: Create the Budget
With a ranked list of projects in place,
the capital budget process boils down
to where your organization "draws the
line" for funding. Invariably, there will
not be enough to cover all your capital
improvement projects. With a ranked
list of projects by priority, it is easy to
see what the current funding level will
address, and what will be deferred till the
next budget cycle.
Step 6: Communicate the Plan
The capital budgeting process invariably
requires defending that budget to
decision-makers. By following an
objective, data-driven process, you
can communicate the rationale for
budget decisions, down to the specific
requirement level, and demonstrate the
impact of different funding levels to the
CEO, CFO, board of directors, and other
key stakeholders. You can also readily
communicate the impact of changes that
may occur over the course of the year, and
how they impact current capital projects.
By basing your capital budget on overall
organizational priorities, quantifying
those priorities, and consistently applying
them to your capital projects, your
organization can ensure that the squeaky
wheel won't drive derail your capital
strategy, and that capital investments
it chooses will add the greatest
possible business value and support
organizational objectives today and in the
future.
Download your Capital Budgeting Resource Kit at vfa.com/fmcap.
About VFA
VFA helps organizations strategically
manage their facility portfolios with
Capital Planning and Management
Solutions (CPMS™) that combine software,
assessment services and business process
consulting. Organizations in government,
education, healthcare and corporate markets
employ VFA solutions to manage more than
two billion square feet of real estate.
Contact us to learn how VFA can help
your organization to optimize its facilities
investment.
In the U.S.: (800) 693-3132
In Canada: (888) 685-3757
On the Web: www.vfa.com
Email: info@vfa.com
Author Bio
Ray Dufresne is a Vice President in the Consulting Services Group of VFA, Inc., a leading provider of software and services for facilities capital planning and asset management. He helps government, education and corporate clients to analyze their facilities portfolios, develop benchmarks, create cost models, and define optimal processes for capital planning. Prior to joining VFA in 1992, Ray was a practicing architect working on the design and construction administration of office, medical, retail and transportation facilities. Ray holds a Bachelor of Architecture from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and is a member of the American Institute of Architects and the Boston Society of Architects. He speaks at industry conferences and has authored articles on the value of effective capital planning and facility management.