In testimony before the U.S. Senate on April 26, 2001, Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao announced principles for an approach to ergonomics policy that emphasizes injury reduction, injury prevention and clarity.
“Ergonomics injuries are real,” Chao said. “And defining the best, comprehensive approach for ergonomic injuries is not a simple process. However, guiding principles will provide a vital starting point for common understanding, a point from which consensus can be attained.”
Chao’s principles include:
- Prevention—Place greater emphasis on preventing injuries before they occur
- Sound Science—Any approach should be based on the best available science and research
- Incentive Driven—Cooperation between OSHA and employers is a must
- Flexibility—Avoid a one-size-fits-all approach
- Feasibility—Small businesses need any future action to recognize cost of compliance
- Clarity—Any approach must include short, simple and common sense instructions
Chao also urged lawmakers not to set an artificial deadline—one of the contributing factors to the demise of the previous ergonomics standard.
“Last year, OSHA was asked to complete the previous standard in an unreasonable period of time,” Chao said. “During the 90-day comment period OSHA received 11,000 written comments, making up 188,547 pages. Piled on top of each other, these comments and supporting documents would be 78 and a half feet high. In fact, standing on top of this stack without a safety harness would probably constitute an OSHA violation.”
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 582,300 musculoskeletal injuries that resulted in employees missing time from work in 1999, the last year for which statistics are available.
