Aculture of flexibility exists when employees and management work together to decide where, when and how to best perform their work. This new way of working shifts the focus from being directed by management toward being self-directed and emphasizing work outcomes. Flexible work practices play a critical role in the future of work, providing a competitive advantage in attracting and retaining talent.
During our interactive session at the Orlando Summit in October 2012, our moderating team posed one of three problemsolving scenarios to a total of 69 participants seated at tables. Each table was given a similar scenario to role play from the perspective of Human Resources (HR), Information Technology (IT) or Corporate Real Estate (CRE). Exhibit 1 highlights the CRE Scenario as a representative example of these exercises. Each table discussed challenges posed by the scenario and success factors they thought would be critical as HR, IT and CRE work together toward building a culture of flexibility.
The biggest challenge identified by all tables was achieving crossfunctional engagement and communication. Early stakeholder involvement was also critical to creating a successful flex work program. While HR, IT and CRE each have their respective roles and responsibilities, cross-functional engagement more effectively allows these staff functions to set common goals, achieve financial support, establish policies and develop change management strategies.
Workplace innovation that supports flex work cannot be achieved by departmentalized staff functions working in their respective silos. And yet, that’s exactly what is still happening in many organizations today. Innovation requires integrated planning, cross-functional collaboration, aligned business processes and shared measures of success among HR, IT and CRE. During our session we presented a collaborative model for assessing organizational maturity to support flex work in this integrated manner. This Maturity Model is summarized in Exhibit 2.
Beyond Silos
Whenever the delivery services by HR, IT and CRE are not integrated, “silo” behavior of these staff functions falls short of delivering synergistic value to the enterprise. Although the “shared services” approach is more common today, we continue to observe that HR, IT and CRE work independently of each other in most companies. Building organizational capacity to support a culture of flexibility requires alignment on shared objectives and measures.
Human Resources
When implementing a telework or flex work initiative, HR professionals have a number of things to consider and work through in order to be successful. At a minimum, the role of HR is to ensure legal compliance in developing and administering policies. In addition, HR must consider compensation, change management, talent management, recruiting, employee value proposition, training and learning, program branding, communication strategies and stakeholder engagement.
Our HR breakout tables also stressed that having financial support from leadership is key. A business case must demonstrate bottom-line return on investment. No different than CRE and IT, HR is expected to reduce operating costs while creating value. Human Resources is often left out of the loop on IT mobility strategies or CRE occupancy strategies. While HR input is critical to the success of any workplace transformation project, their involvement might be mistakenly viewed as unnecessary. In these cases, technology initiatives and workspace redesign projects could miss opportunities for integration with similar initiatives managed by HR.
Corporate Real Estate
CRE is focused on optimizing a portfolio of properties and buildings to satisfy business needs. An ideal strategy provides the right space, in the right location, at the right time and at the right price. This focus includes the following:
- Controlling total occupancy cost
- Reducing process cycle times
- Improving user satisfaction
Traditionally, CRE has focused on company-controlled premises in owned assets or lease commitments. That made sense in times when the primary location of work was one and the same as the controlled portfolio. In the era of mobility, work takes place as much on company premises as it does off. The scope of CRE becomes much broader in terms of supporting distributed work across a network of locations that increasingly includes “third places” in between employee residences and corporate offices, such as coffee shops, business centers and other connected “hot spots” with wireless service.
Moving toward supporting a highly mobile work culture with flexible work practices, CRE must think beyond spaces to services and policies that keep everyone working together across locations. This interdependence of places, practices and platform relies upon integrating the expertise of IT to provide the appropriate technology and infrastructure and HR to establish policies about work practices, e.g., work anywhere anytime. Such integration clearly goes beyond CRE’s traditional role of focusing on the efficiency of the physical portfolio and shifts the focus to the effectiveness of the workforce.
The CRE department of SMART, Inc. recognizes the potential of shared work environments to support new ways of working, produce savings and reduce carbon footprint. Senior CRE management has set forth a challenge to reduce its total portfolio by up to one-third calling for a business case rationale within 90 days.
The CRE department proposes a 100,000 sq.ft- (9, 290 sq.m.-) office consolidation project in Orlando to be completed in early 2014. This consolidation strategy will serve as a model and catalyst for similar portfolio reductions in other cities. The CRE department has decided the following:
- They will increase the employee-to-desk ratio from 1:1 to 2:1.
- They will offer greater choice among a variety of work settings on premises, workat- home and “third places” in between home and office.
- They will reduce cost per person.
- They will reduce employee commutes.
Separately, CRE has just learned of concurrent initiatives in IT and HR related to smart devices and flexible working. Consequently, CRE has just called a meeting with IT and HR to explain its intentions for the consolidation project and coordinate development of the business case for its portfolio reduction strategy.
Information Technology
No matter the size of an organization, the IT function fulfills three primary roles and responsibilities:
- Strategic Planning and Governance: Defining user needs, developing standards, budgeting, emerging technologies, compliance and risk management
- Provisioning: Network and desktop provisioning, access and capacity management, data retention and management and data availability
- Operational Support: Security, device usage, project management, help desk and training services
As CEOs increasingly focus on attracting talent, the CIO’s agenda is being reset by the expectations of a new generation of workers using disruptive technologies including new mobile devices and decentralized social media platforms. Consequently, IT is now critical to the success of a flexible work environment.
Three major influences are challenging the authority of IT and its traditional emphasis on desktop computing:
- Consumerization of IT: Consumer technology is migrating into enterprise computing environments
- New Management Models: Technology investment and usage is causing IT organizations to reinvent themselves
- Risk Management and Security: IT organizations remain hyper-sensitive to exposure of proprietary data and breaches of security
The post-PC era calls for a new IT business model. Disruptive technologies and economic shifts are transforming IT departments. Adopting cloud computing, integrated solutions, smart devices and mobile technologies allow companies to achieve greater flexibility at lower costs. This was not possible just a few short years ago.
Moving Toward Integration
The 11 tables at the workshop each approached their given scenario primarily from one of the above perspectives, i.e., HR, CRE and IT. As the next step, participants were asked to integrate the perspectives of the other two functions by answering the following three questions. Their most common conclusions are summarized as follows:
- What are the cross-functional challenges on which HR, IT and CRE can collaborate in the next 90 days?
- Shared goals, common objectives and balanced measures (financial and non-financial)
- Change management / communication of value proposition, costs and benefits
- Policies on work practices, tools and resource allocation (space utilization)
- Identify three shared measures of success for CRE, HR and IT that will be critical for the success of flexible work practices.
- Quality: Employee engagement / user satisfaction
- Cost: Overall financial performance based on total costs of provisioning (space, tools, services)
- Time: Pilot project delivery schedule (speed to market)
- How will the resulting business case differ from IT, HR or CRE proceeding independently with justification for its pilot?
- Collaborative process results in support of business case by all staff functions
- Enabling technologies and work practices benefits employees with choice and flexibility
- Space savings balanced with investment in tools and business infrastructure
The responses of each table during the workshop reinforced the progressive stages of our Maturity Model. In the ideal end state, a fully institutionalized program has the following characteristics:
- Flex work is a core business operating strategy
- Flex work practices are embedded in the culture
- Employees choose devices, locations and schedules
- Mobile access to ERP data from virtual desktops is secure
- Ongoing communications and training support are provided
- Environmental footprint is reduced
We believe that creating a culture of flexibility will win the quest for talent. In order to do so, more effective means of cross-functional collaboration will be necessary. As session participants agreed, it takes more work upfront in order to reduce downstream conflicts and resistance.
At each stage of the Maturity Model, we recommend that you take the following action steps:
- Engage all parties as early as possible
- Establish common ground with shared objectives
- Agree on how success will be measured from multiple vantage points
- Embrace conflicts as opportunities for constructive problem solving and innovative solutions
- Develop and present a unified business case proposal
- Hold each other jointly accountable for results
While our session lasted only 90 minutes and included a brief presentation, all participants were engaged in active learning in dialogue with each other for the majority of the time. We encourage this effective format to test and apply ideas, stimulate peer-topeer exchange and foster social relations among participants.
| Financial | Information Technology | Human Resources | CRE Management | |
| Level 5 Institutionalized | Enterprise-wide flex work is recognized as a core business strategy for both controlling operating expenses and attracting and retaining talent. The Triple Bottom Line is embedded into the organizational culture. | Enterprise level support for flex work is established. Formal goals are established, enterprise level resources assigned and programs are formally funded. Device choice at option of user. Monitoring & management controls of ERP data in place. | Senior leaders speak openly of flex as strategic business solution. Managers & employees supported with ongoing communication and integrated training. Flex is customized at a team level to fit departmental and individual needs. | Aggressive sharing ratios accommodate growth without space expansion. Activitybased space standards increase variety and choice of unassigned settings. Portfolio footprint is reduced by up to one-third. |
| Level 4 Formalized | Synergy is recognized as beneficial to all constituencies. Flex work is recognized as a pro-active department responsibility. | Cross-division level flex work initiatives are identifi ed and planning begun. Budget sharing in support of initiatives has begun. Device choice at option of end user. Security issues not formalized | Formal flex/telework policy communicated company-wide. Manager and employee training offered. Performance metrics tracked. Intranet site stores flex information. Visible senior leader support. | Performance metrics incent space sharing. Participation in flex work determines space assignment. Proportion of total support space is increased. |
| Level 3 Selectively Deployed | Flex work is recognized as possessing potential cross department and enterprise objectives. | Division or cross-department level flex work strategies are identified and funded. Funding is on a local project level. Device options provided by IT with limited availability of ERP data. | Expanded to departments run by innovative managers of functions that can flex easily. Policies vary by department. Measure success by utilization rates. Skepticism still exists among many managers. | Standards become performancebased. Departmental work processes determine customized solutions. Total costs per person and per seat become measurement focus. |
| Level 2 Experimental | Flex work is recognized as an effective cost reduction initiative at a department level. | Individual department level flex work pilots and initiatives are the norm. Funding is tied to existing budgets. Mobile and laptop devices supplied by IT. No availability of ERP data via Mobile devices. | Flex pilots take place in a few progressive departments. No metrics to measure impact. Trial and error prevails. Communication/training focused on pilot rollout. Not widely discussed. | Pilot Project allows variation from space standards. Change management engages employees. Space sharing ratios beyond 1 person per 1 seat are introduced. |
| Level 1 Ad-Hoc | Flex work impact is not recognized as a distinction at any level in the organization. | Flex work is not formally supported. Individual level informal initiatives are the norm. Funding is ad hoc. No formal device strategy. Use of mobile devices considered a “rogue” effort and discouraged. | Individuals negotiate flex with manager & HR as accommodation. No company policy. Flex not openly discussed. Stigma attached to employees who flex. Face time culture prevents progress. | Prescribed space standards not related to flex work. Space assigned is underutilized. Occupancy cost reduction per Sq.Ft. is independent of flex initiatives. |


